There is currently an application
before the Board of School Directors for the School District of Lancaster for a
new charter school: the Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School
(ABECS). The ABECS proposal offers an alternative education for kindergarten
through fourth grade students in the District. This application is a second
attempt by Mr. Sait Onal and others to establish a charter school in the School
District of Lancaster. The first application, for the Lancaster Science
Academy, was rejected by the school board in 2008. The hearing for the
current application is Tuesday, February 19, and any interested community
members are strongly encouraged to attend.
After reviewing the application for
the proposed Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School, it
appears that the proposed curriculum is poorly-designed and that the Academy
administrators offer no clear means for the proposed school to achieve AYP as
promised.
Additionally, their base of
community supporters includes numerous instances of cronyism and overstatement.
For example:
>A letter of support from
Lutheran Refugee Services is being withdrawn. The original letter of support
was issued and signed by the lead applicant's wife, Selma Onal.
> A letter of support from
Economics Pennsylvania is being withdrawn
> A letter of support from Free
Enterprise, Inc. is being withdrawn.
> A letter of support from
Harrisburg Community College is being withdrawn "based on the ongoing
public scrutiny and concerns regarding allegations of the organization"
> A letter of support from MUDI
Farm Export is signed by the applicant, Sait Onal
> A letter of support from
Transamerica is issued from the agency office managed by Sait Onal and is
signed by an individual who is presumably Mr. Onal's subordinate.
> Additional letters of support
come from Godiva Chocolate in Reading and Etimine USA in Pittsburgh. These
letters promise the opportunity for "job shadow days" and
"summer internships" at their respective locations for the charter
school's kindergarten through fourth grade students.
> One Community Board Member,
Laura Binkley, is listed as an employee of Huntington Learning Center in
Lancaster. Huntington Learning Center no longer operates in Lancaster.
> One former Community Advisory
Board member, when told she was listed as such on their website, responded by
saying, "I'm on their website?" She subsequently advised them that
she was not to be considered a member of their Community Advisory Board and
ensured that her name was removed from their site.
These aspects of their application
speak to our larger concern regarding the applicants' lack of transparency and
honesty.
Furthermore, there is an absence of
truly local community support. Of the fifteen individuals comprising their
Founding Board and Advisory Board, we believe that half or more of these
individuals live outside of the School District of Lancaster.
Moreover, we do not believe that
this charter school application serves an otherwise unmet need in the School
District of Lancaster. There is little about their curriculum that is
innovative, the concerns about their ability to deliver quality education are
significant, and the applicants' true motives appear questionable. We have
great concern about exposing any students, especially K-4 students, to the risk
of five years of substandard education.
We urge the Board of School
Directors for the School District of Lancaster to reject the application for
the Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School.
To:
Board of School Directors, School District of Lancaster
Board of School Directors, School District of Lancaster
We believe that the curriculum for
the proposed Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School is
poorly-designed and that the Academy administrators offer no clear means for
the proposed school to achieve AYP as promised.
We do not believe that this charter school application serves an otherwise unmet need in the School District of Lancaster. There is little about their curriculum that...
We do not believe that this charter school application serves an otherwise unmet need in the School District of Lancaster. There is little about their curriculum that...
We believe that the curriculum for
the proposed Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School is
poorly-designed and that the Academy administrators offer no clear means for
the proposed school to achieve AYP as promised.
We do not believe that this charter school application serves an otherwise unmet need in the School District of Lancaster. There is little about their curriculum that is innovative, the concerns about their ability to deliver quality education are significant, and the applicants' true motives appear questionable. We have great concern about exposing any students, especially K-4 students, to the risk of five years of substandard education.
We urge you to oppose the Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School application.
We do not believe that this charter school application serves an otherwise unmet need in the School District of Lancaster. There is little about their curriculum that is innovative, the concerns about their ability to deliver quality education are significant, and the applicants' true motives appear questionable. We have great concern about exposing any students, especially K-4 students, to the risk of five years of substandard education.
We urge you to oppose the Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School application.
Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your name]
The
Academy of Business & Entrepreneurship Charter School would be an
attractive alternative to conventional schools, giving students the financial
background and business smarts they need to succeed in a
"technology-driven, globally connected" world, backers said.
Opponents attacked the caliber of the school's curriculum, saying it offers nothing new and would be inappropriate for children as young as 5 years old. They also raised concerns the school may be affiliated with a network of U.S. charter schools linked in published reports to a Turkish Muslim movement.
Read more: http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/803790_School-District-of-Lancaster-eyes-charter-school.html#ixzz2ICQKgMhG
Opponents attacked the caliber of the school's curriculum, saying it offers nothing new and would be inappropriate for children as young as 5 years old. They also raised concerns the school may be affiliated with a network of U.S. charter schools linked in published reports to a Turkish Muslim movement.
Read more: http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/803790_School-District-of-Lancaster-eyes-charter-school.html#ixzz2ICQKgMhG
=
Godiva is owned by a Gulenist, it a relatively recent acquistion and it is somewhat amusing that the applicants want small children to shadow and intern at the company. Perhaps they do not have child labor laws in Turkey.
ReplyDelete